<pb xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" ed="oldAA" n="375" xml:id="B01S0375" />Verum nunc, quanam ratione vires spatiis compressionis comparatae se habeant, indagandum. Margo x b in situ 2, quantumlibet aliquantulum incurvatus, tamen in casu compressionum mediocrium pro recto haberi potest, item linea k b in situ 3; ponatur porro, sectionem elastri horizontalem e c <abbr xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">no.</abbr> 1 continuatam per puncta i et g <figure xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="B01S0375Z04Bild01R"> <graphic url="images/band1/B01S0375Z04Bild01R.png" width="33%" /> </figure>transire, quod, quoniam in mediocri compressionis gradu quam proxime accidit, hic absque errore sumi poterit. Est itaque in triangulo i x s angulus x = angulo c, quippe eadem est sectio elastri, quae <abbr xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">no.</abbr> 1, angulus s aequatur verticali <ref xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" type="critApp" xml:id="app37513">suo v</ref>, ideoque triangula s c b et i x s sunt similia. Pariter in triangulo g k h <abbr xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">no.</abbr> 3 omnia cum triangulo h c b eadem ratione se habent, ideoque argumentatio sequens prodit: