Hanc veritatem, quanquam ab adeo facili & fallere nescia rationum <ref xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" type="critApp" xml:id="app41116">pendeat</ref> catena, adeo non animaduerterunt <ref xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" type="editorialNote" target="#en41117">qui Philosophiae</ref> <persName xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" key="wolff_christian"><ref type="editorialNote" target="#en41117">Wolfianae</ref></persName> <ref xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" type="editorialNote" target="#en41117">nomen dant</ref>, vt potius substantiam simplicem e principio actiuitatis interno continuis mutationibus fieri <pb xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" ed="firstPrint" n="32" xml:id="B01S0411Z19fp" />obnoxiam contendant. Equidem ipsorum argumenta probe noui, sed quam ficulnea sint haud minus mihi persuasum est. Vbi enim arbitrariam definitionem Vis ita informarunt, vt <pb xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" ed="AA" n="35" />id quod rationem continet <hi xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" rend="spaced">mutationum</hi> significet, cum potius rationem continere <hi xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" rend="spaced">determinationum</hi> statuenda sit, pronum certe ipsis erat in errorem prolabi.