<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" hand="https://edition-humboldt.de/addressee" place="left"><choice> <abbr>Pfl.</abbr> <expan>Pflanzen</expan> </choice> die <lb />sich ersezen <lb /><ref xml:id="dee3e7a5-375a-4f79-a3e7-a5375a4f7931" corresp="#c92bfe8e-6d18-4cea-abfe-8e6d188cea26" type="editorialNote"><bibl corresp="https://edition-humboldt.de/T5SDE24E"><persName ref="https://edition-humboldt.de/H0011992 http://d-nb.info/gnd/118774891">Hooker</persName> <choice> <abbr>p</abbr> <expan>pagina</expan> </choice> 230</bibl></ref><note xml:id="c92bfe8e-6d18-4cea-abfe-8e6d188cea26" corresp="#dee3e7a5-375a-4f79-a3e7-a5375a4f7931" type="editorial"><bibl corresp="https://edition-humboldt.de/T5SDE24E">Hooker, J. D. 1844–1860</bibl>, I.1: „There are many instances of genera having representatives in those three botanical regions [Südamerika, Australien, Neuseeland, UP], the species being in general mutually more related than to any others [...]. This similarity in some of the botanical productions of countries, otherwise unlike in vegetation, is far more remarkable than a total dissimilarity between lands so far separated, or even than a positive specific identity would be at first sight; because it argues the operation of some agent far above our powers of comprehension, and far other from what we commonly observe to affect geographical distribution.“</note><supplied cert="high">.</supplied></note>