3. There is another Peak between <lb xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" /><note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="left" hand="#unknown"><placeName ref="https://edition-humboldt.de/H0018439 https://www.geonames.org/1279688">Gosaingthan</placeName> <choice> <abbr>od</abbr> <expan>oder</expan> </choice> <placeName ref="https://edition-humboldt.de/H0018439 https://www.geonames.org/1279688">Dhayabung</placeName> <lb /><ref xml:id="e6eba74e-3aed-415d-aba7-4e3aed015dd6" corresp="#eec029c0-abf2-411d-8029-c0abf2811d81" type="editorialNote">Erdkunde <lb />IV, 8, 31, 32<choice> <orig> </orig> <reg>, </reg> </choice>90</ref><note xml:id="eec029c0-abf2-411d-8029-c0abf2811d81" corresp="#e6eba74e-3aed-415d-aba7-4e3aed015dd6" type="editorial"><bibl corresp="https://edition-humboldt.de/I9TR2WMV">Ritter 1822–1859</bibl>, IV, 8, 31, 32, 90.</note> <lb /> </note><placeName xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" ref="https://edition-humboldt.de/H0018439 https://www.geonames.org/1279688">Gossain<note place="inline" hand="#unknown"><metamark>?</metamark></note> than<note place="inline" hand="#unknown"><metamark>?</metamark></note></placeName> & <placeName xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" ref="https://edition-humboldt.de/H0000349 https://www.geonames.org/1283259">Kanchain</placeName> – seen both <lb xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" />from <placeName xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" ref="https://edition-humboldt.de/H0001596 https://www.geonames.org/1282988">Nepal</placeName> valley & thence called <lb xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" /><placeName xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" ref="https://edition-humboldt.de/H0005510"><hi rendition="#u" hand="https://edition-humboldt.de/H0012069 http://d-nb.info/gnd/118554700">“Deodangha”</hi></placeName> & also from <placeName xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" ref="https://edition-humboldt.de/H0010238 https://www.geonames.org/1256312">Sikkim</placeName><supplied xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" cert="high">.</supplied> <lb xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" />This has never been measured <lb xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" /><choice xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"> <sic>till</sic> <corr type="deleted" /> </choice> since my last letter to you <lb xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" />nor even laid down on charts – <lb xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" /><hi xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" rendition="#mMM" hand="https://edition-humboldt.de/H0012069 http://d-nb.info/gnd/118554700">but which <choice> <abbr>Col.</abbr> <expan>Colonel</expan> </choice> <persName ref="https://edition-humboldt.de/H0006264 http://d-nb.info/gnd/117155829">Waugh</persName> considers <lb />as probably a very little higher <lb />than either <placeName ref="https://edition-humboldt.de/H0000349 https://www.geonames.org/1283259">Kanchain</placeName> or <placeName ref="https://edition-humboldt.de/H0005520 https://www.geonames.org/1283457">Dawalgari</placeName>.</hi>