Einzelne Lösungsansätze liegen hier bereits vor; so wird als Kriterium für die Reduktion eines themenübergreifenden Korpus auf ein thematisches Diskurskorpus häufig das Vorkommen eines oder mehrerer repräsentativer Schlagwörter in den Texten angesetzt <?biblio ADDIN ZOTERO_ITEM CSL_CITATION {"citationID":"seWTcYxz","properties":{"formattedCitation":"(vgl. aus dem Bereich der Frame-Forschung etwa Baker et al., 2020; Storjohann & Schr//uc0//u246{}ter, 2011; Ziem et al., 2018)","plainCitation":"(vgl. aus dem Bereich der Frame-Forschung etwa Baker et al., 2020; Storjohann & Schröter, 2011; Ziem et al., 2018)","noteIndex":0},"citationItems":[{"id":1305,"uris":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/5U9DXGI9"],"uri":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/5U9DXGI9"],"itemData":{"id":1305,"type":"article-journal","abstract":"Obesity is a persistently newsworthy topic for the UK press and in recent years levels of coverage have increased. In this study, we examine the ways in which obesity has been framed by the press over a ten-year period (2008–2017), focussing both on areas of stability and change. The analysis is based on a ~36 million-word database of all UK newspaper articles mentioning the words ‘obese’ or ‘obesity’ published within this time frame and draws upon techniques from corpus linguistics – a collection of computational methods for examining recurrent linguistic patterns in large bodies of language data. Our analysis shows that, over time, obesity is represented increasingly as a biomedical problem that is both caused and should be prevented by individual action. Meanwhile, focus on wider environmental determinants of health, including the role of Government and the food industry, decreases over time. In the paper, we situate these trends within the wider context of UK society and argue that they both represent the increasing dominance of neoliberal models of health but also have the potential to contribute to weight stigma and the blaming of individuals. Accordingly, it is argued that the press should seek greater balance in its reporting of the potential causes of and solutions to obesity, as well as closer alignment with scientific evidence. By doing so, the press could begin to report on obesity in a way that raises useful public awareness around the topic and which challenges some of the stigma that currently attends to this social justice issue.","container-title":"Social Science & Medicine","DOI":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113403","ISSN":"02779536","journalAbbreviation":"Social Science & Medicine","language":"en","page":"113403","source":"DOI.org (Crossref)","title":"Changing frames of obesity in the UK press 2008–2017","volume":"264","author":[{"family":"Baker","given":"Paul"},{"family":"Brookes","given":"Gavin"},{"family":"Atanasova","given":"Dimitrinka"},{"family":"Flint","given":"Stuart W."}],"issued":{"date-parts":[["2020",11]]}},"prefix":"vgl. aus dem Bereich der Frame-Forschung etwa"},{"id":1346,"uris":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/VMIWKLWS"],"uri":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/VMIWKLWS"],"itemData":{"id":1346,"type":"article-journal","container-title":"Aptum","page":"32-53","title":"Die Ordnung des öffentlichen Diskurses der Wirtschaftskrise und die (Un-) Ordnung des Ausgeblendeten","volume":"7","author":[{"family":"Storjohann","given":"Petra"},{"family":"Schröter","given":"Melani"}],"issued":{"date-parts":[["2011"]]}}},{"id":1351,"uris":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/YTYEDHZM"],"uri":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/YTYEDHZM"],"itemData":{"id":1351,"type":"chapter","collection-number":"2","collection-title":"Proceedings in Language and Cognition","container-title":"Frames interdisziplinär: Modelle, Anwendungsfelder, Methoden","event-place":"Düsseldorf","ISBN":"978-3-11-072037-2","note":"DOI: 10.1515/9783110720372","page":"155-182","publisher":"Düsseldorf University Press","publisher-place":"Düsseldorf","source":"DOI.org (Crossref)","title":"Medien-Frames als semantische Frames: Aspekte ihrer methodischen und analytischen Verschränkung am Beispiel der ‚Snowden-Affäre‘","URL":"https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110720372/html","editor":[{"family":"Ziem","given":"Alexander"},{"family":"Inderelst","given":"Lars"},{"family":"Wulf","given":"Detmer"}],"author":[{"family":"Ziem","given":"Alexander"},{"family":"Pentzold","given":"Christian"},{"family":"Fraas","given":"Claudia"}],"accessed":{"date-parts":[["2021",5,27]]},"issued":{"date-parts":[["2018"]]}}}],"schema":"https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/raw/master/csl-citation.json"}?>(vgl. aus dem Bereich der Frame-Forschung etwa Baker et al. 2020; Storjohann & Schröter 2011; Ziem et al. 2018). Dass eine Vielzahl sprachlicher Muster einzelne Deutungsrahmen aufrufen und perspektivieren, ist jedoch eine Kernannahme der linguistischen Frame-Theorie <?biblio ADDIN ZOTERO_ITEM CSL_CITATION {"citationID":"XFCDvz2G","properties":{"formattedCitation":"(Ruppenhofer et al., 2016)","plainCitation":"(Ruppenhofer et al., 2016)","noteIndex":0},"citationItems":[{"id":1281,"uris":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/4Q2AJ3UX"],"uri":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/4Q2AJ3UX"],"itemData":{"id":1281,"type":"book","edition":"Revised November 1, 2016","title":"FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice","URL":"https://framenet2.icsi.berkeley.edu/docs/r1.7/book.pdf","author":[{"family":"Ruppenhofer","given":"Josef"},{"family":"Ellsworth","given":"Michael"},{"family":"Petruck","given":"Miriam R. L."},{"family":"Johnson","given":"Christopher R."},{"family":"Baker","given":"Collin F."},{"family":"Scheffczyk","given":"Jan"}],"issued":{"date-parts":[["2016"]]}}}],"schema":"https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/raw/master/csl-citation.json"}?>(vgl. etwa die Rolle der <hi xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" rend="italic">Lexical Units</hi> in Fillmores FrameNet, Ruppenhofer et al. 2016). Ähnlich haben Kozlowski et al. (2019) unter Anwendung von <hi xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" rend="italic">word embeddings</hi> gezeigt, dass kulturelle Kategorien über die Zeit stabil bleiben, die assoziierten Wortvektoren jedoch „in constant flux“ (S. 929) sind. Während einzelne Arbeiten auch dies berücksichtigen, indem erst ganze Begriffsfelder empirisch ermittelt und dann in einem nicht-thematischen Korpus abgefragt werden <?biblio ADDIN ZOTERO_ITEM CSL_CITATION {"citationID":"Zj0KnGCQ","properties":{"formattedCitation":"(Czulo et al., 2020)","plainCitation":"(Czulo et al., 2020)","noteIndex":0},"citationItems":[{"id":1051,"uris":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/9LB4PSPB"],"uri":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/9LB4PSPB"],"itemData":{"id":1051,"type":"article-journal","abstract":"In diesem Beitrag untersuchen wir die Darstellung von Rechtsextremismus, Linksextremismus und Islamismus im medialen Diskurs am Beispiel von SPIEGEL Online, einem der deutschen Leitmedien. Wir leiten vier zentrale Dimensionen für die Konzeptualisierung von Extremismen ab: Ideologie und Organisation, Herkunft der Akteure, Stellung zur Gesellschaft und Typische Handlungen. Wir beobachten die Entwicklung der Darstellung der drei Extremismen an möglichen Bruchpunkten: Wir untersuchen das assoziative Framing der drei Extremismen vor und nach prominenten extremismusbezogenen Gewaltereignissen, namentlich die Anschläge des 11. September, die Veröffentlichung des NSU-Skandals und linksextremistische Aktivitäten während des G20-Gipfels in Hamburg. Mittels einer Kollokationsanalyse identifizieren wir mit den Extremismen assoziierte Aspekte und ordnen diese den Konzeptualisierungsdimensionen zu. Wir beobachten Veränderungen im Framing, die durch die ausgewählten Ereignisse bedingt sind, und vergleichen das resultierende Framing mit den Kerndefinitionen des Verfassungsschutzes aus dem Bericht des Jahres 2017, um mögliche Unterschiede in der Konzeptualisierung von Extremismen mit möglicherweise unterschiedlichen Handlungslogiken als Resultat divergierender Konzeptualisierungen herauszuarbeiten.","container-title":"Journal für Medienlinguistik","DOI":"10.21248/JFML.2020.11.2","issue":"1","language":"de","note":"dimensions: 14-45 Seiten/npublisher: Journal für Medienlinguistik","page":"14-45","source":"DOI.org (Datacite)","title":"Der Einfluss extremistischer Gewaltereignisse auf das Framing von Extremismen auf SPIEGEL Online","volume":"3","author":[{"family":"Czulo","given":"Oliver"},{"family":"Nyhuis","given":"Dominic"},{"family":"Weyell","given":"Adam"}],"issued":{"date-parts":[["2020",10,20]]}}}],"schema":"https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/raw/master/csl-citation.json"}?>(Czulo et al. 2020), bleiben die diskursanalytischen Potenziale neuerer Verfahren des N <hi xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" rend="italic">atural Language Processing</hi> weitgehend ungenutzt. Hier können insbesondere unüberwachte Algorithmen wie <hi xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" rend="italic">Topic Modeling</hi> <?biblio ADDIN ZOTERO_ITEM CSL_CITATION {"citationID":"hKHotXm4","properties":{"unsorted":true,"formattedCitation":"(vgl. zu Potenzialen f//uc0//u252{}r die Diskursanalyse Murakami et al., 2017; kritisch Brookes & McEnery, 2019)","plainCitation":"(vgl. zu Potenzialen für die Diskursanalyse Murakami et al., 2017; kritisch Brookes & McEnery, 2019)","noteIndex":0},"citationItems":[{"id":1165,"uris":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/EHWVUHFK"],"uri":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/EHWVUHFK"],"itemData":{"id":1165,"type":"article-journal","abstract":"This paper introduces topic modelling, a machine learning technique that automatically identifies ‘topics’ in a given corpus. The paper illustrates its use in the exploration of a corpus of academi...","container-title":"Corpora","DOI":"10.3366/cor.2017.0118","ISSN":"1749-5032","issue":"2","journalAbbreviation":"Corpora","note":"publisher: Edinburgh University Press","page":"243-277","source":"Edinburgh University Press Journals","title":"‘What is this corpus about?’: using topic modelling to explore a specialised corpus","title-short":"‘What is this corpus about?","volume":"12","author":[{"family":"Murakami","given":"Akira"},{"family":"Thompson","given":"Paul"},{"family":"Hunston","given":"Susan"},{"family":"Vajn","given":"Dominik"}],"issued":{"date-parts":[["2017",8,1]]}},"prefix":"vgl. zu Potenzialen für die Diskursanalyse"},{"id":1171,"uris":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/RA5UKI64"],"uri":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/RA5UKI64"],"itemData":{"id":1171,"type":"article-journal","container-title":"Discourse Studies","DOI":"10.1177/1461445618814032","ISSN":"1461-4456, 1461-7080","issue":"1","journalAbbreviation":"Discourse Studies","language":"en","page":"3-21","source":"DOI.org (Crossref)","title":"The utility of topic modelling for discourse studies: A critical evaluation","title-short":"The utility of topic modelling for discourse studies","volume":"21","author":[{"family":"Brookes","given":"Gavin"},{"family":"McEnery","given":"Tony"}],"issued":{"date-parts":[["2019",2]]}},"prefix":"kritisch"}],"schema":"https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/raw/master/csl-citation.json"}?>(vgl. zu Potenzialen für die Diskursanalyse Murakami et al. 2017; kritisch Brookes & McEnery 2019) oder <hi xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" rend="italic">Word Embeddings</hi> (vgl. zu Anwendungen in diskursanalytischer Forschung etwa Bubenhofer et al. 2020; Kozlowski et al. 2019) einerseits eine Eingrenzung des im Rahmen der Dissertation verwendeten multithematischen Korpus, andererseits einen Zugang zu einzelnen Framings in verschiedenen Diskursbereichen ermöglichen. Auf vorliegende Forschung zur <hi xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" rend="italic">Semantic Frame Induction</hi> <?biblio ADDIN ZOTERO_ITEM CSL_CITATION {"citationID":"8o14uRep","properties":{"formattedCitation":"(vgl. etwa die im Kontext von QasemiZadeh et al., 2019 ver//uc0//u246{}ffentlichten Konferenzbeitr//uc0//u228{}ge)","plainCitation":"(vgl. etwa die im Kontext von QasemiZadeh et al., 2019 veröffentlichten Konferenzbeiträge)","noteIndex":0},"citationItems":[{"id":1352,"uris":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/DADITD46"],"uri":["http://zotero.org/users/5390315/items/DADITD46"],"itemData":{"id":1352,"type":"paper-conference","abstract":"This paper presents Unsupervised Lexical Frame Induction, Task 2 of the International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation in 2019. Given a set of prespecified syntactic forms in context, the task requires that verbs and their arguments be clustered to resemble semantic frame structures. Results are useful in identifying polysemous words, i.e., those whose frame structures are not easily distinguished, as well as discerning semantic relations of the arguments. Evaluation of unsupervised frame induction methods fell into two tracks: Task A) Verb Clustering based on FrameNet 1.7; and B) Argument Clustering, with B.1) based on FrameNet's core frame elements, and B.2) on VerbNet 3.2 semantic roles. The shared task attracted nine teams, of whom three reported promising results. This paper describes the task and its data, reports on methods and resources that these systems used, and offers a comparison to human annotation.","container-title":"Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation","DOI":"10.18653/v1/S19-2003","event":"SemEval 2019","event-place":"Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA","page":"16–30","publisher":"Association for Computational Linguistics","publisher-place":"Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA","source":"ACLWeb","title":"SemEval-2019 Task 2: Unsupervised Lexical Frame Induction","title-short":"SemEval-2019 Task 2","URL":"https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/S19-2003","author":[{"family":"QasemiZadeh","given":"Behrang"},{"family":"Petruck","given":"Miriam R. L."},{"family":"Stodden","given":"Regina"},{"family":"Kallmeyer","given":"Laura"},{"family":"Candito","given":"Marie"}],"accessed":{"date-parts":[["2021",6,16]]},"issued":{"date-parts":[["2019",6]]}},"prefix":"vgl. etwa die im Kontext von","suffix":"veröffentlichten Konferenzbeiträge"}],"schema":"https://github.com/citation-style-language/schema/raw/master/csl-citation.json"}?>(vgl. etwa die im Kontext von QasemiZadeh et al. 2019 veröffentlichten Konferenzbeiträge) kann in dieser Hinsicht nur bedingt aufgebaut werden, da diese zumeist bereits vorliegende FrameNet-Frames zu identifizieren versucht, anstatt epistemologisch komplexere Deutungsrahmen zu rekonstruieren (vgl. zu einer Kritik an FrameNet aus diskurslinguistischer Sicht Busse 2012: 210-213).