However, as noted by Rodrigues Alves et al. (2018), unlike scientific publications (which have been the target of most RM methods), Humanities texts are significantly less structured. The following three reasons should be considered: 1) Humanities research uses both primary and secondary sources, and the former are, by definition, more varied; 2) references can happen anywhere in the text (footnotes, image captions, etc.); and lastly 3) “the variety of publication venues, languages, scholarly communities in the arts and humanities are broader, making reference practices and styles less uniform” (Rodrigues Alves et al., 2018). To this list we should add the fact due to the lack of strict editorial guidelines, dissertations tend to have a less structured reference list than in established publications.