Annotator feedback highlighted several challenges, including the complexity of the historical language and context, metaphors and satire, and the expression of multiple sentiments in one sentence (Krušić, 2024a). Despite these complexities, preliminary results indicate a fair to moderate level of agreement (0.405), which is in line with expectations and previous work (Sprugnoli et al., 2023; Schmidt et al., 2019, 2018). Further, the annotation process yielded an Average Percentage Agreement (APA) of 92.5% for majority agreement (achieved by at least two out of three annotators). These outcomes demonstrate the reliability of the annotation methodology, supporting the development of a gold-standard corpus consisting of 930 sentences, with plans for further expansion in subsequent annotation phases.