While it is unsurprising that references to earlier volumes of the edition ( <hi xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" rend="italic">self_ref)</hi>were minimal in the early phases, the first volume seems to be an outlier for other categories as well. In the first volume, lexical footnotes were the most prevalent, whereas in later volumes, the miscellaneous category consistently became the most dominant. Similarly, the categories <hi xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" rend="italic">bible</hi>and <hi xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" rend="italic">missing</hi>show notable outliers in the first edition. The first edition can be interpreted as an experimental phase, while over time, editorial norms were established, leading to greater consistency in label usage.