Figure 3 also highlights an inverse relationship between lexical and miscellaneous footnotes, particularly evident in volume 11. This volume stands out as an outlier, with an unusually high percentage of miscellaneous footnotes coupled with a low percentage of lexical ones. While this edition introduced two new editors, Moser and Kess, the same editorial team also worked on volumes 12 and 13 without repeating this pattern. As before, this suggests that the anomaly in volume 11 reflects a specific editorial decision rather than a direct result of the new team members.